Examiner Reginald Glenwood Bragdon has allowed 129 of 224 decided applications (58%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Reginald Glenwood Bragdon maintains a public record across five art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 224 decided applications, his allowance rate is 58%, representing 129 allowed and 95 abandoned applications. His pooled record spans art units 2139, 2185, 2186, 2188, and 2189. Allowance rates across individual art units range from 23% to 95%, reflecting variation in the examiner's decisions by art unit. Two applications remain pending and are excluded from the allowance calculation.
This pooled record aggregates data across five separate art units within TC 2100. The 58% allowance rate describes historical outcomes on decided applications and is not a prediction about any specific application. The range of 23% to 95% across art units shows that outcomes vary by art unit; individual art-unit records provide more specific guidance for applications in particular art units.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 26 decided applications with an interview and 58 without.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Reginald Glenwood Bragdon has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 226 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP