Examiner Reji P Kartholy has allowed 100 of 156 decided applications (64%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Reji P Kartholy maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 184 total applications, 156 have been disposed. Of those 156 decided applications, 100 were allowed and 56 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 64%. The examiner's work spans a single art unit. This record reflects outcomes on applications that have reached a final decision; it does not include pending cases.
This pooled record aggregates data across all art units in which the examiner works. The allowance rate of 64% describes the examiner's historical rate on decided applications and is not a prediction about any specific application. Pooled figures mask variation across individual art units; a separate section on this page presents per-art-unit detail. Aggregate statistics describe the past record only.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 115 decided applications with an interview and 41 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Reji P Kartholy has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 184 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP