Examiner Reshaun Finkley has allowed 24 of 27 decided applications (89%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Reshaun Finkley maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 27 disposed applications, the allowance rate stands at 89%, with 24 allowed and 3 abandoned. The record spans a single art unit. The allowance rate describes the examiner's historical record of decided applications and is not a prediction for any specific pending matter. These figures aggregate all applications within the examiner's jurisdiction and represent outcomes already concluded.
This profile aggregates the examiner's record across all art units under their jurisdiction. The pooled allowance rate reflects past dispositions and is historical data only—not a forecast of any individual application's outcome. Aggregate statistics describe the examiner's overall practice but do not predict results in a particular case. Individual applications may vary based on claim scope, prior art, and prosecution history.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Based on 27 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Reshaun Finkley has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 27 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP