Examiner Reza Hosseini has allowed 45 of 81 decided applications (56%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Reza Hosseini's public record covers Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) across a single art unit. Over 81 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 45 and abandoned 36, yielding an allowance rate of 56%. This rate reflects outcomes across all decided cases in the pooled record and does not represent a prediction for any individual application. The record aggregates all examination activity within TC 2100 for this examiner.
A pooled record aggregates results across all art units assigned to an examiner. The allowance rate reported here reflects past outcomes on all decided applications combined and describes what occurred, not what will occur on any specific case. Individual art-unit records, where available separately, may show variation. Aggregate figures provide context for historical examination activity but are not predictive tools.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 40 decided applications with an interview and 41 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Reza Hosseini has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 81 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP