Examiner Richard B Franklin has allowed 671 of 807 decided applications (83%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Richard B Franklin has a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 834 total applications, 671 were allowed and 136 were abandoned, yielding 807 disposed applications. The allowance rate over those decided applications is 83%. The examiner's work spans one art unit. This pooled record reflects historical outcomes across all assigned matters in the technology center and does not predict results in any individual application.
This record aggregates outcomes across all art units to which the examiner is assigned. An allowance rate is calculated from decided applications (allowed plus abandoned), excluding pending filings. Pooled figures describe the examiner's aggregate past record and are correlational—they characterize what has occurred, not what will occur in any specific case. Art-unit data, where available separately, may show variation within the pooled total.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines interconnection and data transfer between memory, I/O, and processing units, and program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 166 decided applications with an interview and 641 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Richard B Franklin has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 834 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP