Examiner Richard M Russell has allowed 15 of 37 decided applications (41%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Richard M Russell maintains a public record spanning two art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 37 disposed applications, 15 were allowed and 22 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 41%. This rate reflects only decided cases and excludes any pending applications. The examiner's pooled record aggregates activity across the assigned art units and represents historical disposition data without reference to the outcomes of any future filings.
A pooled record aggregates outcomes across all assigned art units into a single set of statistics. The allowance rate of 41% describes past dispositions and is not a prediction for any specific application. Pooled figures mask variation between individual art units—detail on per-unit performance appears separately. Historical rates are correlational data only and do not establish causation or outcome probabilities for new cases.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Based on 17 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Richard M Russell has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 37 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP