LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/RICHARD M RUSSELL
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Richard M Russell

TECH CENTER 2100 · 2 ART UNITS · 37 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUL 2019
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 2 ART UNITS

Examiner Richard M Russell has allowed 15 of 37 decided applications (41%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

41% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2172 · 55%AU 2178 · 24%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Richard M Russell maintains a public record spanning two art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 37 disposed applications, 15 were allowed and 22 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 41%. This rate reflects only decided cases and excludes any pending applications. The examiner's pooled record aggregates activity across the assigned art units and represents historical disposition data without reference to the outcomes of any future filings.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates outcomes across all assigned art units into a single set of statistics. The allowance rate of 41% describes past dispositions and is not a prediction for any specific application. Pooled figures mask variation between individual art units—detail on per-unit performance appears separately. Historical rates are correlational data only and do not establish causation or outcome probabilities for new cases.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2172
20 APPS · 55% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA
55% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 58%
DISPOSITION11 / 9 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION20.9 moart unit avg 24.2 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY50.1 moart unit avg 44.7 mo
ART UNIT 2178
17 APPS · 24% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA
24% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 54%
DISPOSITION4 / 13 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION19.2 moart unit avg 25.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY44.5 moart unit avg 41.3 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility25% · art unit 36%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)33%
§103 — Obviousness83% · art unit 79%
§112 — Written description & definiteness67%

Based on 17 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Richard M Russell

  • What is Richard M Russell's overall allowance rate?
    Across 37 disposed applications, the allowance rate is 41% (15 allowed, 22 abandoned). This figure describes only decided cases and is not a prediction of outcome for any pending or future application.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    Richard M Russell is assigned to two art units (2172 and 2178) within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). This pooled record combines data across both units.
  • What does the pooled record show?
    The pooled record aggregates historical dispositions across all assigned art units. It describes what has occurred but does not forecast outcomes for specific applications or reveal variation between individual art units.
  • How many applications has this examiner decided?
    37 applications have been disposed: 15 allowed and 22 abandoned. Pending applications are excluded from this count.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Richard M Russell has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 37 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP