Examiner Rijue Mai

What the data says.

Rijue Mai's public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spans one art unit. Across 63 disposed applications, the allowance rate is 95%, with 60 allowed and 3 abandoned applications. This rate describes the examiner's historical record of decided cases and does not forecast outcomes in any particular application. The pooled figure aggregates the examiner's work across all assigned art units.

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates an examiner's statistics across multiple art units. The allowance rate and application counts reflect historical disposition data—applications that have been decided (allowed or abandoned). This aggregate snapshot is descriptive of past record only and is not a prediction about any specific pending application or future examination outcome.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines data-processing methods for specific functions, and processing data by its order or content.

Questions about Examiner Rijue Mai

• 01What is Rijue Mai's overall allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 95%, based on 63 disposed applications (60 allowed, 3 abandoned). This is a historical measure and not a prediction of any specific application.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  Rijue Mai's record spans one art unit (2182) within Technology Center 2100.
• 03What does the pooled record include?

  The pooled record aggregates all disposed applications across the examiner's assigned art units. It describes past outcomes and is not predictive of any individual case.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.