Examiner Robert A Cassity has allowed 226 of 305 decided applications (74%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Robert A Cassity's public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spans one art unit. Across 305 disposed applications, 226 were allowed and 79 were abandoned, yielding a 74% allowance rate. This rate reflects the proportion of decided applications in the examiner's pooled record. The data covers all applications adjudicated across the examiner's assigned art units and does not account for pending matters.
This pooled record aggregates outcomes across all art units assigned to the examiner. The 74% allowance rate describes the historical outcome of decided applications and is correlational data—a snapshot of past dispositions. Aggregate figures do not predict the outcome of any individual application. Patent prosecution involves many case-specific variables beyond examiner statistics. Applicants may consult this record as background context only.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines control or regulating systems, and electric power networks.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 131 decided applications with an interview and 174 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Robert A Cassity has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 305 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP