Examiner Robert N Day has allowed 5 of 24 decided applications (21%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Robert N Day maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 69 total applications, 24 applications have been disposed (decided). Of those 24 disposed applications, 5 were allowed and 19 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 21% over the decided count. The examiner's record spans a single art unit. This pooled figure represents the examiner's aggregate outcome across all applications in that unit and does not constitute a prediction for any individual application.
A pooled record aggregates statistics across all art units under an examiner's jurisdiction. The allowance rate of 21% describes outcomes on 24 decided applications and reflects the examiner's past record to date. Aggregate figures are historical and do not forecast the result of any particular application. Because this record pools all art units together, individual art-unit variation is not visible in the pooled view.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Robert N Day has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 69 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP