Examiner Robert W Beausoliel Jr has allowed 21 of 43 decided applications (49%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Robert W Beausoliel Jr maintains a public record of 43 disposed applications across three art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of these decided applications, 21 were allowed and 22 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 49%. The examiner's record spans art units 2113, 2167, and 2184. Allowance rates across these art units range from 20% to 77%, reflecting variation in outcomes within TC 2100.
This pooled record aggregates three separate art units under a single technology center. The 49% overall allowance rate describes past outcomes across all decided applications in this examiner's combined record and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Individual art-unit records may differ from the pooled average. Aggregate figures reflect historical disposition patterns and do not indicate how any pending or future application will be examined.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Based on 22 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Based on 20 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Primarily examines interconnection and data transfer between memory, I/O, and processing units.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Robert W Beausoliel Jr has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 43 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP