Examiner Roberto E Luna has allowed 79 of 90 decided applications (88%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Roberto E Luna maintains a public record of 90 disposed applications across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of these decided applications, 79 were allowed and 11 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 88%. This pooled figure represents the aggregate outcome across all art units under this examiner's jurisdiction. The record reflects decisions made on applications presented to the examiner over the period covered by public USPTO data.
This profile aggregates Roberto E Luna's record across multiple art units within TC 2100. The allowance rate of 88% describes past decisions on 90 disposed applications and is a historical summary, not a prediction of outcome for any individual application. Pooled records combine different subject areas and examination contexts, so aggregate figures do not indicate how any single application will be handled. The data reflects what has occurred, not what will occur.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 50 decided applications with an interview and 25 without.
Primarily examines software engineering, and error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Based on 15 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Roberto E Luna has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 90 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP