Examiner Roderick Tolentino has allowed 37 of 59 decided applications (63%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Roderick Tolentino maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). His record spans one art unit and covers 59 disposed applications. Of those 59 decided applications, 37 were allowed and 22 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 63%. This rate reflects applications on which final dispositions were entered; applications pending examination are excluded from this calculation.
This pooled record aggregates outcomes across all of Tolentino's art units. The allowance rate shown (63% over 59 disposed applications) describes the examiner's past record and represents a statistical snapshot of outcomes already decided. Aggregate figures do not predict the outcome of any individual application. Understanding that pooled data combines multiple art units helps contextualize the overall figures in relation to any particular submission.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines network security, and computer and data security.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 18 decided applications with an interview and 41 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Roderick Tolentino has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 59 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP