Examiner Russell Warren Frejd has allowed 423 of 471 decided applications (90%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Russell Warren Frejd maintains a record across 2 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 471 disposed applications, the examiner has allowed 423 and abandoned 48, yielding an allowance rate of 90%. This pooled figure aggregates activity across art units 2123 and 2128. The record reflects outcomes on decided matters only; pending applications are excluded from the allowance-rate calculation. The data presented here describes the historical record and does not constitute prediction of outcomes on any individual application.
This profile pools outcomes across multiple art units within TC 2100. Aggregate figures describe past decisions across a range of subject matter within that technology center and are not predictions specific to any single application. An allowance rate reflects the share of decided applications that were allowed relative to total disposed matters. Pooled data masks variation by art unit; detailed per-unit records appear separately on this page.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines machine learning, and neural-network / biological-model computing.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 41 decided applications with an interview and 425 without.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Russell Warren Frejd has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 471 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP