Examiner Ryan A Jarrett has allowed 1,185 of 1,443 decided applications (82%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Ryan A Jarrett has a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning three art units: 2116, 2121, and 2125. Across 1,443 disposed applications, he allowed 1,185, for an allowance rate of 82%. The allowance rate ranges from 69% to 92% across these art units, reflecting variation in the record within TC 2100. This pooled figure represents outcomes already decided; pending applications are excluded from the calculation.
A pooled record aggregates results across multiple art units into a single overall statistic. The 82% allowance rate describes past dispositions across all three units combined and is historical data only—not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. The range (69% to 92%) shows that individual art units within TC 2100 may differ from the aggregate. Pooled figures are useful for understanding an examiner's broad record but do not account for variation by art unit or application specifics.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines control or regulating systems.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 92 decided applications with an interview and 585 without.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 119 decided applications with an interview and 405 without.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 53 decided applications with an interview and 189 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Ryan A Jarrett has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 1,485 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP