LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/RYAN PAUL FIEGLE
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Ryan Paul Fiegle

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 43 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION FEB 2007
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Ryan Paul Fiegle has allowed 18 of 43 decided applications (42%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

42% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Ryan Paul Fiegle maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). His pooled record spans one art unit and covers 43 disposed applications. Of those 43 decided applications, 18 were allowed and 25 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 42%. This figure represents the proportion of applications that received allowances among all applications with final dispositions in his record. The record reflects outcomes across all art units in which he has examined applications.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates examination outcomes across all art units in which Examiner Fiegle has worked. The 42% allowance rate describes historical dispositions and reflects past outcomes only. Pooled figures do not account for variation by art unit, technology, or application-specific factors. An aggregate allowance rate is a statistical summary of past decisions and is not a prediction for any individual application or case.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2183
43 APPS · 42% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines program control and execution.

42% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 72%
DISPOSITION18 / 25 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION31.6 moart unit avg 25 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY46.2 moart unit avg 40.1 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Ryan Paul Fiegle

  • What is Examiner Fiegle's overall allowance rate?
    His pooled allowance rate is 42%, based on 18 allowances among 43 disposed applications.
  • How many art units does Examiner Fiegle cover?
    His public record spans one art unit (2183) within TC 2100.
  • What does the allowance rate include or exclude?
    The allowance rate is calculated from decided applications (allowed plus abandoned). Pending applications are excluded. The rate does not reflect the total number of filings, only outcomes with final dispositions.
  • Does this pooled rate predict the outcome of my application?
    No. The pooled rate is a historical summary and is not a prediction of any specific application.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Ryan Paul Fiegle has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 43 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP