Examiner Saba Ahmed has allowed 196 of 298 decided applications (66%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Saba Ahmed's public record spans Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) across one art unit. Over 298 disposed applications, the allowance rate is 66%, with 196 allowed and 102 abandoned. This allowance rate is based on decided applications only and does not include pending filings. The record reflects outcomes across a single art unit within TC 2100.
A pooled record aggregates data across all art units under an examiner's purview and represents historical dispositions. The allowance rate describes past outcomes on decided applications and is not a prediction for any specific pending application. Individual art-unit records, where available separately, may show variation from pooled figures. Aggregate statistics characterize a historical sample, not a forecast.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 195 decided applications with an interview and 103 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Saba Ahmed has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 298 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP