Examiner Sabrina Leticia Greene has allowed 71 of 167 decided applications (43%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Sabrina Leticia Greene has a public record of 167 disposed applications across two art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of those decided applications, 71 were allowed and 96 were abandoned, yielding an overall allowance rate of 43%. Her allowance rate ranges from 38% to 46% across these art units. This pooled figure represents her aggregate record and does not predict outcomes in any specific application.
This record is pooled across multiple art units within TC 2100, aggregating different subject areas. Pooled allowance rates describe historical dispositions and do not forecast the result of any individual application. The range reflects variation among the examiner's art units; the overall rate is a summary across all her work in this technology center. These figures are correlational—they characterize what has occurred, not what will occur in future cases.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 29 decided applications with an interview and 65 without.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 23 decided applications with an interview and 50 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Sabrina Leticia Greene has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 167 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP