Examiner Sajeda Muhebbullah has allowed 87 of 292 decided applications (30%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Sajeda Muhebbullah has a public record across 3 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 292 decided applications, the examiner allowed 87, for an allowance rate of 30%. The allowance rate ranges from 27% to 32% across these art units. This pooled figure represents applications that were either allowed or abandoned; pending applications are excluded from the calculation. The record spans multiple art units within TC 2100, and individual art-unit rates may vary from the overall aggregate.
A pooled record aggregates data across multiple art units, presenting an overall allowance rate rather than unit-by-unit detail. The 30% figure describes historical disposal outcomes—allowed and abandoned applications combined—across 292 decided cases. This aggregate rate is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. The range of 27% to 32% reflects variation among the examiner's individual art units; applicants may find separate unit-level data in a dedicated section of this page.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 45 decided applications with an interview and 64 without.
Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 59 decided applications with an interview and 68 without.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 38 decided applications with an interview and 18 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Sajeda Muhebbullah has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 333 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP