Examiner Saket K Daftuar has allowed 20 of 53 decided applications (38%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Saket K Daftuar has a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 53 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 20 and abandoned 33, for an allowance rate of 38% over the decided count. This record spans a single art unit. The 38% allowance rate reflects the ratio of allowed to total decided applications in the examiner's pooled history and does not represent a prediction for any specific application.
This record aggregates the examiner's work across all art units under their responsibility. The 38% allowance rate is a historical statistic describing past decisions on 53 disposed applications and reflects no prediction about any particular case. Pooled figures mask differences in subject matter, claim scope, prior art, and applicant arguments across individual art units. Aggregate data describes the examiner's overall record, not the outcome of any single application.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Saket K Daftuar has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 53 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP