LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/SAKET K DAFTUAR
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Saket K Daftuar

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 53 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION SEP 2008
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Saket K Daftuar has allowed 20 of 53 decided applications (38%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

38% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Saket K Daftuar has a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 53 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 20 and abandoned 33, for an allowance rate of 38% over the decided count. This record spans a single art unit. The 38% allowance rate reflects the ratio of allowed to total decided applications in the examiner's pooled history and does not represent a prediction for any specific application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This record aggregates the examiner's work across all art units under their responsibility. The 38% allowance rate is a historical statistic describing past decisions on 53 disposed applications and reflects no prediction about any particular case. Pooled figures mask differences in subject matter, claim scope, prior art, and applicant arguments across individual art units. Aggregate data describes the examiner's overall record, not the outcome of any single application.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2151
53 APPS · 38% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

38% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 57%
DISPOSITION20 / 33 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION39.1 moart unit avg 31.7 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY56.8 moart unit avg 44.1 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Saket K Daftuar

  • What is Saket K Daftuar's allowance rate?
    The examiner's allowance rate is 38%, based on 20 allowed applications out of 53 total disposed applications in the pooled record.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    This examiner's record spans one art unit (2151) within TC 2100.
  • Does the allowance rate predict the outcome of my application?
    No. The allowance rate is a historical summary of past decisions and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
  • What technology does this examiner handle?
    This examiner works in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Saket K Daftuar has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 53 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP