Examiner Saleh Najjar has allowed 33 of 46 decided applications (72%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Saleh Najjar has a public record of 46 disposed applications across 3 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of those 46 decided applications, 33 were allowed and 13 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 72%. This rate is calculated from applications with final decisions—allowed and abandoned combined—and does not include any pending matters. The pooled figure spans multiple art units and represents the examiner's aggregate record in this technology center.
This record aggregates data across three art units, producing a single allowance rate that reflects the examiner's combined history in TC 2100. The 72% figure describes outcomes on decided applications only and is based on historical dispositions. Pooled rates across multiple art units do not isolate performance in any single art unit and do not forecast the outcome of any new or pending application. The statistic is historical summary only.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Saleh Najjar has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 46 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP