Examiner Samantha Hoang has allowed 27 of 28 decided applications (96%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Samantha Hoang maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Her pooled record spans 1 art unit and covers 28 disposed applications. Of those 28 decided applications, 27 were allowed and 1 was abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 96%. This figure is computed from applications with final dispositions and excludes pending filings. The record reflects her examination activity across the specified technology center.
This pooled record aggregates examination data across all art units under Samantha Hoang's assignment. The allowance rate of 96% describes the historical ratio of allowed to decided applications in her past work. Pooled figures mask variation among individual art units and do not constitute a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Aggregate statistics describe what has occurred, not what will occur in any given case.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines control or regulating systems, and electric power networks.
Based on 28 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Samantha Hoang has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 28 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP