Examiner Sanchita Roy has allowed 250 of 339 decided applications (74%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Sanchita Roy maintains a public record across 3 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 339 disposed applications, the allowance rate stands at 74%. Of 372 total applications on file, 250 were allowed and 89 were abandoned. The allowance rate varies across the examiner's art units, ranging from 68% to 86%. This pooled figure represents decisions rendered across all three art units and does not reflect pending applications.
This record aggregates data across multiple art units, producing a single allowance rate that reflects the examiner's historical decisions in TC 2100. The 74% figure describes applications already decided—both allowed and abandoned—and is not a prediction of outcome for any specific pending application. The range (68%–86%) shows variation among individual art units; the aggregate rate reflects all three combined.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 161 decided applications with an interview and 61 without.
Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 55 decided applications with an interview and 31 without.
Based on 31 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Sanchita Roy has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 372 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP