Examiner Saoussen Besrour has allowed 26 of 49 decided applications (53%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Saoussen Besrour's public record spans Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across one art unit, 49 applications have been disposed of—26 allowed and 23 abandoned. The overall allowance rate is 53%, computed over the 49 decided applications. This pooled figure represents the examiner's historical record in TC 2100 and does not characterize the outcome of any particular filing.
This record aggregates examination activity across all art units in which the examiner works. The allowance rate shown—53% over 49 disposed applications—is a historical snapshot of decisions already made, not a prediction for any specific application. Pooled figures smooth variation across different art units and subject-matter areas; they describe past patterns only and do not indicate how any future case will be examined or decided.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Saoussen Besrour has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 49 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP