Examiner Saqib Javaid Siddiqui has allowed 15 of 23 decided applications (65%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Saqib Javaid Siddiqui maintains a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 23 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 15 and abandoned 8, yielding an allowance rate of 65%. This rate reflects the ratio of allowed applications to all decided applications in the pooled record. The examiner's work spans multiple art units within TC 2100, and the figures presented aggregate activity across both units.
A pooled record aggregates an examiner's work across multiple art units. The allowance rate—here 65% over 23 decided applications—describes the historical record and reflects past dispositions. This aggregate figure does not constitute a prediction of any specific application's outcome and does not isolate performance by individual art unit. Pooled data is useful context for understanding an examiner's overall profile but does not control the examination of any particular case.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines control or regulating systems.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Saqib Javaid Siddiqui has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 23 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP