Examiner Scott Martin Kelly has allowed 17 of 47 decided applications (36%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Scott Martin Kelly maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across a pooled record of 47 disposed applications, Kelly allowed 17 and oversaw 30 abandonments. The allowance rate is 36% over the 47 decided applications. The examiner's record spans one art unit, 2176. These figures describe the historical record and do not forecast outcomes in any individual application.
This pooled record aggregates all dispositions across Kelly's art units in TC 2100. The 36% allowance rate is computed from all allowed and abandoned applications decided, not from total filings. Pooled figures describe past outcomes across the full practice and are not predictions about any particular application or filing. Differences in outcomes across specific art units appear in separate art-unit detail sections.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.
Based on 47 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Scott Martin Kelly has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 47 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP