Examiner Scott T Baderman has allowed 107 of 155 decided applications (69%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Scott T Baderman has a public record spanning 5 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 155 disposed applications, 107 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 69%. The examiner's allowance rate varies across the art units served: the range extends from 4% to 95%. This spread reflects the diversity of subject matter and application outcomes across the different art units in TC 2100.
This pooled record aggregates data from 5 separate art units into a single profile. The overall 69% allowance rate represents historical outcomes across all these art units combined and describes past dispositions only. Pooled figures do not account for variations by art unit, technology, or application type, and are not predictions of any specific application's outcome.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Based on 33 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Based on 26 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Primarily examines interconnection and data transfer between memory, I/O, and processing units.
Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Scott T Baderman has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 173 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP