Examiner Sean M Weinman

What the data says.

Sean M Weinman maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). His pooled record spans one art unit. Across 63 disposed applications, 52 were allowed and 11 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 83%. This rate reflects the ratio of allowed to decided applications in his historical record and does not constitute a prediction for any specific pending or future application. The pooled figure aggregates data across his assigned art units.

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates Weinman's examination history across all assigned art units within TC 2100. The allowance rate of 83% describes past dispositions and is a historical aggregate, not a forecast. Pooled figures combine different art units and subject areas. Individual art-unit records, where separately published, may show variation. Aggregate statistics characterize the overall record and do not predict the outcome of any individual application.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines control or regulating systems, and electric power networks.

Questions about Examiner Sean M Weinman

• 01What is Weinman's overall allowance rate?

  His allowance rate is 83%, based on 52 allowed applications out of 63 disposed applications in his pooled record.
• 02How many art units does Weinman cover?

  Weinman's public record spans one art unit (Art Unit 2115) within TC 2100.
• 03Does the allowance rate predict my application's outcome?

  No. The allowance rate is a historical aggregate and does not predict the outcome of any specific application. Individual results depend on claim scope, specification, and prosecution arguments.
• 04What subject matter does Weinman examine?

  Weinman examines applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.