Examiner Selena Sabah Nahra

What the data says.

Selena Sabah Nahra maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Her pooled record spans 1 art unit and covers 40 total applications. Of 24 disposed applications, 18 were allowed and 6 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 75% across decided cases. This rate reflects her historical record and is calculated from applications that received final decisions; pending applications are not included in the allowance rate calculation.

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates outcomes across all art units under which the examiner has issued decisions. The allowance rate of 75% describes the share of decided applications that resulted in allowance over the examiner's public history. Aggregate figures reflect past outcomes and are not predictions of the outcome for any individual application. The breadth of the record—here, 1 art unit—indicates the scope of subject matter covered in the data presented.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines software engineering.

Questions about Examiner Selena Sabah Nahra

• 01What is Selena Sabah Nahra's overall allowance rate?

  Her allowance rate is 75%, based on 18 allowed applications out of 24 total disposed applications in her pooled record.
• 02How many art units does this record cover?

  This pooled record spans 1 art unit within TC 2100.
• 03Does the allowance rate include pending applications?

  No. The allowance rate is calculated only from decided (disposed) applications. Of her 40 total applications, 24 have been disposed; pending cases are excluded from the rate.
• 04What does this record mean for my application?

  This pooled record describes historical outcomes and is not a prediction for any specific application. Each case depends on claim scope, prior art, and examination findings.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.