Examiner Selene Haedi has allowed 95 of 126 decided applications (75%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Selene Haedi maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning two art units. Across 126 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 95 and abandoned 31, yielding an allowance rate of 75%. The allowance rate varies across the examiner's art units, ranging from 64% to 81%. This pooled figure aggregates the examiner's work across both art units and describes the historical record of decided applications.
A pooled record combines data across multiple art units into a single aggregate figure. The 75% allowance rate represents past decisions on 126 applications across both art units and is a historical description only—not a prediction for any specific application. The range (64% to 81%) illustrates variation among the art units but does not indicate which specific unit will handle a particular filing or what its outcome will be.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines machine learning, and neural-network / biological-model computing.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 61 decided applications with an interview and 23 without.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Based on 42 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Selene Haedi has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 126 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP