Examiner Shambhavi K Patel

What the data says.

Shambhavi K Patel's public record spans Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), covering 292 disposed applications across a single art unit. Of those decided applications, 183 were allowed and 109 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 63%. This pooled figure represents the examiner's historical record of allowances among all applications that have reached a final disposition in TC 2100.

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates dispositions across all of the examiner's art units. The allowance rate of 63% describes what occurred in past decided cases and is not a prediction about any individual application's outcome. Pooled figures smooth variation across different art units and do not indicate performance on any specific technology or claim type. They serve as a historical reference point only.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines machine learning, and neural-network / biological-model computing.

Questions about Examiner Shambhavi K Patel

• 01What is Shambhavi K Patel's overall allowance rate?

  The examiner's allowance rate is 63%, based on 292 disposed applications (183 allowed, 109 abandoned). This is a summary of past decisions and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
• 02How many art units does this examiner work in?

  Shambhavi K Patel works in one art unit (Art Unit 2128) within TC 2100. The figures presented here are pooled across all art units in which the examiner has a record.
• 03What does the pooled allowance rate represent?

  The pooled rate aggregates all of the examiner's disposed applications across art units. It describes historical outcomes in decided cases and does not account for differences between specific technologies, claim types, or individual applications.
• 04How many applications has this examiner decided?

  The examiner has disposed of 292 applications total, all of which fall into TC 2100. Dispositions include both allowed and abandoned applications.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.