Examiner Shamcy Alghazzy has allowed 38 of 71 decided applications (54%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Shamcy Alghazzy maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 106 total applications, 71 have been disposed of (decided), comprising 38 allowed and 33 abandoned. The allowance rate over disposed applications is 54%. The examiner's pooled record spans one art unit. This data reflects historical outcomes and does not constitute a prediction for any pending or future application.
This record is pooled across all art units assigned to the examiner. An aggregate allowance rate describes the examiner's past decisions across multiple areas within TC 2100 and is not a prediction of the outcome of any specific application. Pooled figures smooth variations that may exist within individual art units and reflect overall historical performance only.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines machine learning, and neural-network / biological-model computing.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 39 decided applications with an interview and 32 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Shamcy Alghazzy has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 106 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP