LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/SHAMCY ALGHAZZY
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Shamcy Alghazzy

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 71 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Shamcy Alghazzy has allowed 38 of 71 decided applications (54%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

54% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Shamcy Alghazzy maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 106 total applications, 71 have been disposed of (decided), comprising 38 allowed and 33 abandoned. The allowance rate over disposed applications is 54%. The examiner's pooled record spans one art unit. This data reflects historical outcomes and does not constitute a prediction for any pending or future application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This record is pooled across all art units assigned to the examiner. An aggregate allowance rate describes the examiner's past decisions across multiple areas within TC 2100 and is not a prediction of the outcome of any specific application. Pooled figures smooth variations that may exist within individual art units and reflect overall historical performance only.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2128
106 APPS · 54% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines machine learning, and neural-network / biological-model computing.

54% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 53%
DISPOSITION38 / 33 / 35allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION35 moart unit avg 30 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY52.9 moart unit avg 46.5 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility67% · art unit 65%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)89%
§103 — Obviousness92% · art unit 84%
§112 — Written description & definiteness54%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW51%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW56%-5 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 39 decided applications with an interview and 32 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Shamcy Alghazzy

  • What is Shamcy Alghazzy's allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 54% over 71 disposed applications. This is a historical record and is not a prediction of any specific application.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    The examiner's public record spans one art unit (Art Unit 2128) in Technology Center 2100.
  • How many applications are included in this record?
    106 total applications are in the public record. Of these, 71 have been disposed of (38 allowed, 33 abandoned), and the remainder are pending.
  • What does the pooled allowance rate mean?
    The pooled rate aggregates outcomes across all art units assigned to this examiner and reflects past decisions only, not a prediction for any individual application.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Shamcy Alghazzy has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 106 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP