Examiner Shanto Abedin has allowed 34 of 60 decided applications (57%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Shanto Abedin maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across one art unit, the examiner has disposed of 60 applications. Of those 60 decided applications, 34 were allowed and 26 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 57%. This pooled figure represents the examiner's overall record across all art units in the technology center and describes past dispositions only.
A pooled record aggregates data across multiple art units, if applicable, and presents an overall snapshot of the examiner's historical dispositions. The allowance rate is calculated from decided applications only—applications allowed and abandoned—and excludes pending cases. Aggregate figures describe the past record and are not predictions about outcomes in any specific application. Individual art-unit records, when available separately, provide granular detail.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 18 decided applications with an interview and 42 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Shanto Abedin has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 60 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP