Examiner Shashi Kamala Becker has allowed 46 of 104 decided applications (44%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Shashi Kamala Becker maintains a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 104 disposed applications, the examiner's allowance rate is 44%. This means that of the 104 decided applications—46 allowed and 58 abandoned—44% resulted in allowance. The pooled figure reflects activity spanning art units 2142 and 2179. This record is a historical summary and does not forecast outcomes for any individual application.
This pooled record aggregates data across multiple art units within TC 2100. The 44% allowance rate describes the examiner's historical proportion of allowed decisions among all decided applications across these units. Pooled statistics combine different subject areas and examination practices. The aggregate figure is a factual summary of past dispositions and is not a prediction for any specific pending application or prosecution path.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 21 decided applications with an interview and 75 without.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Shashi Kamala Becker has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 104 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP