Examiner Shew Fen Lin has allowed 312 of 483 decided applications (65%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Shew Fen Lin maintains a pooled allowance rate of 65% across 483 disposed applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). This record spans a single art unit. The allowance rate reflects decisions on 312 allowed and 171 abandoned applications. The 65% figure describes the examiner's historical record on applications that have been decided; it is not a prediction for any pending or future application.
This pooled record aggregates data across all art units in which the examiner has worked. The allowance rate and application counts represent the examiner's historical performance on decided cases and do not constitute a forecast of outcomes on specific applications. Aggregate statistics describe past disposal patterns and allowance frequency. Individual applications may differ materially from the pooled average based on claim scope, prior art, and prosecution history.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 315 decided applications with an interview and 168 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Shew Fen Lin has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 483 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP