LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/SHEWAYE GELAGAY
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Shewaye Gelagay

TECH CENTER 2100 · 2 ART UNITS · 68 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION OCT 2008
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 2 ART UNITS

Examiner Shewaye Gelagay has allowed 27 of 68 decided applications (40%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

40% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2137 · 44%AU 2133 · 11%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Examiner Shewaye Gelagay holds a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 68 disposed applications, the examiner issued 27 allowances and 41 abandonments, for an allowance rate of 40%. This rate reflects decided cases only and does not include pending applications. The pooled figure aggregates outcomes across both art units and describes the examiner's past record without predicting outcomes in any specific case.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates data across multiple art units, presenting an overall historical snapshot rather than a per-unit breakdown. The allowance rate of 40% is calculated from all decided applications across both art units combined. This aggregate figure describes what occurred in the past and is not a prediction of how any individual application will be examined or decided. Art-unit-specific rates, where available separately, may differ from the pooled figure.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2137
59 APPS · 44% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

44% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 68%
DISPOSITION26 / 33 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION39.5 moart unit avg 25.8 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY59 moart unit avg 41.7 mo
ART UNIT 2133
9 APPS · 11% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

11% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 82%
DISPOSITION1 / 8 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION40 moart unit avg 22.9 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY47.7 moart unit avg 34.8 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Shewaye Gelagay

  • What is the examiner's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 40%, calculated from 27 allowed applications and 41 abandoned applications across 68 total disposed applications.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    The examiner's public record spans 2 art units (2133 and 2137), all within TC 2100.
  • Does the pooled allowance rate predict outcomes in my application?
    No. The pooled rate describes past outcomes across both art units combined and is not a prediction of any specific application's disposition.
  • Why is the allowance rate calculated only from disposed applications?
    Allowance rate measures decided cases (allowed or abandoned) only. Pending applications lack a final disposition and are excluded from the calculation.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Shewaye Gelagay has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 68 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP