Examiner Shih-Wei Kraft has allowed 160 of 261 decided applications (61%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Shih-Wei Kraft's public record spans Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), covering one art unit. Across 261 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 160 and abandoned 101, yielding a 61% allowance rate. This rate reflects the share of decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) in the examiner's pooled record. The allowance rate is calculated from applications that reached final disposition and does not include pending filings. This pooled figure represents the examiner's aggregate history across the art units covered.
A pooled record aggregates data across multiple art units into a single overall profile. The allowance rate and application counts presented here combine all units under this examiner's jurisdiction. These figures describe the examiner's past record and reflect historical disposition patterns. Pooled data do not predict outcomes in any individual application, nor do they account for variation across different art units or technology areas. Each application is examined on its own merits.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 163 decided applications with an interview and 98 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Shih-Wei Kraft has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 261 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP