LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/SHIN HON CHEN
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Shin Hon Chen

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 103 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION NOV 2008
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Shin Hon Chen has allowed 67 of 103 decided applications (65%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

65% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Examiner Shin Hon Chen maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across one art unit, the examiner has disposed of 103 applications. Of those disposed applications, 67 were allowed and 36 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 65%. This record represents all decided cases and excludes pending applications. The pooled allowance rate reflects the examiner's historical disposition of applications across the assigned art unit.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This record aggregates examination activity across a single art unit within TC 2100. The figures describe the examiner's past record of decided applications and are historical in nature. An aggregate allowance rate is not a prediction of the outcome of any specific application. Individual art units may have distinct practice patterns; this pooled view presents the overall picture across the examiner's assigned work.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2131
103 APPS · 65% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

65% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 56%
DISPOSITION67 / 36 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION36.3 moart unit avg 26.1 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY51.9 moart unit avg 41.7 mo
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW97%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW51%+46 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 31 decided applications with an interview and 72 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Shin Hon Chen

  • What is Examiner Chen's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 65%, calculated from 67 allowed applications and 36 abandoned applications out of 103 total disposed applications.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    This record covers one art unit (Art Unit 2131) within Technology Center 2100.
  • What does the allowance rate mean for my application?
    The allowance rate describes the examiner's historical record of decided cases. It is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Individual applications are examined on their own merits under applicable patent law.
  • How many applications has this examiner decided?
    The examiner has disposed of 103 applications, of which 67 were allowed and 36 were abandoned.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Shin Hon Chen has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 103 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP