LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/SHIRLEY D. HICKS
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Shirley D. Hicks

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 112 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Shirley D. Hicks has allowed 71 of 112 decided applications (63%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

63% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Shirley D. Hicks maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 167 total applications, 112 applications have been decided (allowed or abandoned). Of those 112 decided applications, 71 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 63%. The examiner's record spans a single art unit. This pooled figure reflects outcomes across all work in that art unit and describes the past record only.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This profile aggregates the examiner's complete work history across all art units in TC 2100. The allowance rate is computed from decided applications only (allowed plus abandoned), excluding pending cases. Aggregate historical figures describe patterns in closed applications and are not predictions about any specific pending or future application. Individual art-unit records may show different rates and are available separately.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2168
167 APPS · 63% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

63% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 65%
DISPOSITION71 / 41 / 55allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION15.8 moart unit avg 23.3 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY36.1 moart unit avg 43.5 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility41% · art unit 46%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)100%
§103 — Obviousness88% · art unit 83%
§112 — Written description & definiteness55%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW81%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW24%+57 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 78 decided applications with an interview and 34 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Shirley D. Hicks

  • What is Shirley D. Hicks's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 63%, based on 71 allowed applications out of 112 total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned).
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    Shirley D. Hicks works in one art unit within TC 2100.
  • What does the pooled allowance rate represent?
    The pooled rate aggregates all decided applications across the examiner's art units and reflects historical outcomes. It is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
  • How many applications has this examiner handled?
    The examiner's record includes 167 total applications, of which 112 have been decided and 41 have been abandoned.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Shirley D. Hicks has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 167 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP