Examiner Shiuh-Huei P Ku has allowed 65 of 91 decided applications (71%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Shiuh-Huei P Ku maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). The examiner has disposed of 91 applications across a single art unit. Of those 91 decided applications, 65 were allowed and 26 were abandoned, yielding an overall allowance rate of 71%. This figure represents the examiner's pooled record and reflects outcomes on applications that have reached final disposition. The record covers a defined set of closed matters and does not include pending applications.
This record aggregates outcomes across all art units in which the examiner works. The allowance rate of 71% describes historical dispositions—applications already decided—and is not a prediction of how any future or pending application will be examined or decided. Pooled figures mask variation across individual art units and technology areas. A complete understanding of the examiner's record may require review of the per-art-unit breakdown, where available.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines machine learning, and neural-network / biological-model computing.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 48 decided applications with an interview and 43 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Shiuh-Huei P Ku has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 91 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP