Examiner Shoun Jose Abraham has allowed 28 of 40 decided applications (70%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Shoun Jose Abraham's public record spans Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 40 disposed applications, 28 were allowed and 12 were abandoned, resulting in an allowance rate of 70%. This rate reflects decisions on applications that have been resolved; it does not include pending matters. The examiner's record is pooled across a single art unit, providing a unified view of dispositions within TC 2100. These figures represent historical outcomes and do not predict the result of any individual application.
This pooled record aggregates all applications across the examiner's art units within TC 2100 into one statistical profile. The allowance rate of 70% describes past decisions on 40 resolved applications and is not a prediction for any new or specific case. Pooled figures smooth variation across different art units and offer a general snapshot of historical dispositions. Individual applications may be influenced by claim scope, prior art, and other application-specific facts not captured in aggregate statistics.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Based on 40 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Shoun Jose Abraham has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 40 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP