Examiner Shourjo Dasgupta has allowed 322 of 479 decided applications (67%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Shourjo Dasgupta's public record spans 3 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), encompassing 515 total applications. Of 479 disposed applications, 322 were allowed, yielding an overall allowance rate of 67%. The allowance rate across individual art units ranges from 65% to 76%. This pooled figure aggregates outcomes across multiple art units and reflects the examiner's historical record; it does not characterize performance in any specific art unit or predict outcomes in future applications.
A pooled record aggregates data across multiple art units, producing an overall allowance rate that reflects cumulative historical outcomes. This aggregate figure describes past disposition and is not a prediction of any particular application's outcome. Individual art units may vary; the range reported here (65% to 76%) indicates that variation exists. Pooled statistics are useful for understanding overall patterns but do not substitute for unit-specific analysis.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 233 decided applications with an interview and 128 without.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 59 decided applications with an interview and 32 without.
Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.
Based on 27 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Shourjo Dasgupta has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 515 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP