Examiner Siamak S Hefazi

What the data says.

Siamak S Hefazi maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 22 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 16 and 6 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 73% over the decided count. The examiner's work spans one art unit. This record reflects decisions made on applications within TC 2100 and does not forecast outcomes on any pending or future case.

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates data across all art units where the examiner has worked. The allowance rate of 73% describes past dispositions and is not a prediction applicable to any individual application. Aggregate figures mask variation within art units and do not indicate how any specific claim or technology will be examined. Historical rates describe what occurred, not what will occur in any given case.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines control or regulating systems.

Questions about Examiner Siamak S Hefazi

• 01What is Siamak S Hefazi's allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 73%, calculated over 22 disposed applications (16 allowed, 6 abandoned). This is a historical measure and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  The examiner's public record spans one art unit within TC 2100.
• 03What does the 73% allowance rate mean?

  Of 22 decided applications, 16 were allowed. The rate describes decisions already made and is not indicative of how any new application will be treated.
• 04Why does the record cover multiple art units or just one?

  This pooled profile aggregates all art units where the examiner has worked. Figures are combined across units and do not isolate performance by individual art unit or technology area.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.