Examiner Simon Fischer Ellis

What the data says.

Simon Fischer Ellis maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 23 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 11 and 12 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 48%. The record spans a single art unit. This allowance rate reflects the ratio of allowed to decided applications and does not constitute a prediction for any specific case. The figures represent historical dispositions and remain subject to the full record of each individual application's prosecution.

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates data across the examiner's art units and reflects past dispositions only. The overall allowance rate is a summary statistic describing what occurred in closed applications and is not a forecast for any pending or future case. When reviewing an examiner's record, distinguish between aggregate figures (which describe historical volume and rates) and individual application outcomes (which depend on claim scope, prior art, and prosecution conduct).

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

Questions about Examiner Simon Fischer Ellis

• 01What is Simon Fischer Ellis's overall allowance rate?

  The examiner's allowance rate is 48%, based on 11 allowed applications and 12 abandoned applications out of 23 total disposed applications.
• 02How many art units does this examiner work in?

  The public record spans one art unit (2125) in TC 2100.
• 03Does the allowance rate predict the outcome of my application?

  No. The allowance rate is a historical summary of closed applications and is not a prediction of any specific case's outcome. Each application's prosecution depends on its own claims, prior art, arguments, and amendments.
• 04What technology does this examiner cover?

  The examiner works in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.