Examiner Skylar K Vanwormer has allowed 11 of 28 decided applications (39%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Skylar K Vanwormer has a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning 2 art units. Across 28 disposed applications, the allowance rate is 39%. Of the examiner's 71 total applications on file, 11 have been allowed and 17 abandoned. This pooled record aggregates outcomes from art units 2129 and 2146. The figures reflect historical disposition data and do not constitute a prediction for any future application.
This is a pooled record combining two art units within TC 2100. Aggregate statistics like the 39% allowance rate describe the examiner's past decisions across both art units combined. These figures reflect historical outcomes only and are not predictive of any specific application's disposition. Per-art-unit detail, where available separately, may reveal variation within the pooled average.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Based on 1 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Skylar K Vanwormer has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 71 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP