Examiner Soheila Davanlou has allowed 186 of 359 decided applications (52%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Soheila Davanlou's public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spans 2 art units and covers 359 disposed applications. Of those decided cases, 186 were allowed and 173 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 52%. The allowance rate across the examiner's art units ranges from 42% to 56%. This pooled figure represents the examiner's aggregate record across both art units and does not predict outcomes in any specific application.
This pooled record aggregates the examiner's work across multiple art units in TC 2100. The 52% allowance rate reflects decided applications only—cases pending are excluded. The range of 42% to 56% across art units shows variation within the examiner's portfolio. Pooled figures describe historical record and are not predictions for any individual application or art unit.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 167 decided applications with an interview and 82 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 37 decided applications with an interview and 73 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Soheila Davanlou has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 359 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP