Examiner Sookil J Lee has allowed 30 of 61 decided applications (49%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Sookil J Lee maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 61 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 30 and abandoned 31, corresponding to an allowance rate of 49%. This figure represents the share of decided cases—applications with final dispositions of allowance or abandonment—within the examiner's pooled record. The examiner's practice spans a single art unit, meaning all statistics reflect work within one classification area. The 49% allowance rate is the historical record of decisions rendered; it is not predictive of outcomes in any specific application.
This pooled record aggregates all applications decided by the examiner across their art unit(s) in TC 2100. The allowance rate is a backward-looking summary: it describes what portion of finalized cases resulted in allowance over a defined period. Aggregate statistics do not predict the outcome of any individual application and do not account for differences in claim scope, prior art, or applicant conduct. A pooled rate reflects a mix of technologies and prosecution histories within the technology center's scope.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 40 decided applications with an interview and 21 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Sookil J Lee has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 61 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP