LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/SOOKIL J LEE
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Sookil J Lee

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 61 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION SEP 2018
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Sookil J Lee has allowed 30 of 61 decided applications (49%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

49% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Sookil J Lee maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 61 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 30 and abandoned 31, corresponding to an allowance rate of 49%. This figure represents the share of decided cases—applications with final dispositions of allowance or abandonment—within the examiner's pooled record. The examiner's practice spans a single art unit, meaning all statistics reflect work within one classification area. The 49% allowance rate is the historical record of decisions rendered; it is not predictive of outcomes in any specific application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates all applications decided by the examiner across their art unit(s) in TC 2100. The allowance rate is a backward-looking summary: it describes what portion of finalized cases resulted in allowance over a defined period. Aggregate statistics do not predict the outcome of any individual application and do not account for differences in claim scope, prior art, or applicant conduct. A pooled rate reflects a mix of technologies and prosecution histories within the technology center's scope.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2144
61 APPS · 49% ALLOWANCE
49% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 58%
DISPOSITION30 / 31 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION23.8 moart unit avg 27.2 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY43 moart unit avg 41.7 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility33% · art unit 45%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)78%
§103 — Obviousness100% · art unit 92%
§112 — Written description & definiteness67%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW70%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW10%+60 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 40 decided applications with an interview and 21 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Sookil J Lee

  • What is Sookil J Lee's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 49%, based on 30 allowed applications and 31 abandoned applications (61 disposed total). Pending applications are excluded from this calculation.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    The record spans 1 art unit (2144), meaning all statistics are pooled from a single classification group within TC 2100.
  • What does the 49% allowance rate mean for my application?
    The 49% is a historical aggregate of past dispositions. It is not a prediction of the outcome of any specific application and does not indicate the likelihood of allowance or abandonment in your case.
  • Does this record include pending applications?
    No. The allowance rate is calculated only from disposed applications (those with final decisions). Pending applications are not counted in the rate.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Sookil J Lee has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 61 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP