Examiner Soumya Dasgupta has allowed 117 of 155 decided applications (75%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Soumya Dasgupta's public record spans Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 155 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 117 and abandoned 38, yielding a 75% allowance rate. The record covers a single art unit. This allowance rate represents the share of decided applications (allowed and abandoned combined) and does not include pending filings. The figures reflect historical dispositions and are not predictions of outcomes in any pending or future application.
A pooled record aggregates data across all art units under an examiner's jurisdiction. The allowance rate shown is the percentage of decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) and describes the past record only. This aggregate figure does not predict the outcome of any specific application, which depends on claim scope, prior art, written description sufficiency, and other application-specific factors. Pooled statistics provide historical context but are not probative of any individual case.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 76 decided applications with an interview and 79 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Soumya Dasgupta has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 155 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP