Examiner Stephanie Wu has allowed 281 of 338 decided applications (83%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Stephanie Wu maintains a public record across one art unit in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Her pooled allowance rate is 83%, computed over 338 disposed applications (allowed and abandoned decisions combined). Of the 364 total applications in her record, 281 were allowed and 57 were abandoned. This allowance rate represents her historical disposition record and does not constitute a prediction for any specific pending or future application.
This pooled record aggregates Wu's work across a single art unit in TC 2100. The 83% allowance rate reflects past decisions on 338 closed applications and describes historical outcomes only. Aggregate figures do not predict results in any individual application, which depends on claim scope, prior art, examiner assignment, and other case-specific factors. Pooled data provides context for an examiner's overall record but is not a forecast.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 161 decided applications with an interview and 177 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Stephanie Wu has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 364 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP