Examiner Stephen David Berman has allowed 320 of 396 decided applications (81%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Stephen David Berman maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). His pooled record spans one art unit and covers 430 total applications. Of 396 disposed applications, 320 were allowed and 76 were abandoned. The allowance rate across these decided applications is 81 percent. This rate reflects outcomes on applications that have reached final disposition and does not include pending applications.
This examiner's record aggregates dispositions across all assigned art units into a single pooled allowance rate. The 81 percent figure describes historical outcomes on decided applications and is not a prediction of outcome on any specific application. Aggregate statistics describe the past record only. Individual art-unit records, when available separately, may show variation from the pooled rate.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines software engineering.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 305 decided applications with an interview and 91 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Stephen David Berman has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 430 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP