LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/STEPHEN DAVID BERMAN
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Stephen David Berman

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 396 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Stephen David Berman has allowed 320 of 396 decided applications (81%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

81% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Stephen David Berman maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). His pooled record spans one art unit and covers 430 total applications. Of 396 disposed applications, 320 were allowed and 76 were abandoned. The allowance rate across these decided applications is 81 percent. This rate reflects outcomes on applications that have reached final disposition and does not include pending applications.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This examiner's record aggregates dispositions across all assigned art units into a single pooled allowance rate. The 81 percent figure describes historical outcomes on decided applications and is not a prediction of outcome on any specific application. Aggregate statistics describe the past record only. Individual art-unit records, when available separately, may show variation from the pooled rate.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2192
430 APPS · 81% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines software engineering.

81% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 66%
DISPOSITION320 / 76 / 34allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION17.9 moart unit avg 29.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY31.9 moart unit avg 45.1 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility53% · art unit 46%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)89%
§103 — Obviousness97% · art unit 81%
§112 — Written description & definiteness66%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW91%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW47%+44 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 305 decided applications with an interview and 91 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Stephen David Berman

  • What is this examiner's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 81 percent, calculated from 320 allowed applications and 76 abandoned applications (396 total decided applications). This is a historical figure and not a prediction for any pending or future application.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    This examiner's public record covers one art unit in TC 2100.
  • What does the pooled record mean?
    The pooled record combines outcomes across all assigned art units into aggregate figures. These statistics describe the examiner's past disposition history and do not predict the outcome of any individual application.
  • How many applications has this examiner decided?
    The examiner has disposed 396 applications (320 allowed, 76 abandoned) out of 430 total applications on the public record. The remaining applications are pending.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Stephen David Berman has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 430 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP