Examiner Stephen S Hong has allowed 50 of 101 decided applications (50%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Stephen S Hong maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning 2 art units. Across 101 disposed applications, his allowance rate is 50%. This rate reflects the proportion of decided cases (allowed and abandoned combined) in his pooled record. Of 108 total applications, 50 were allowed and 51 were abandoned. Seven applications remain pending and are excluded from the allowance-rate calculation. The record aggregates activity across multiple art units and represents historical outcomes only.
This examiner's pooled record combines data from 2 art units within TC 2100. Aggregate figures describe past decisions across a mixed portfolio and do not predict outcomes in any individual application. The allowance rate is calculated from decided applications only—allowed plus abandoned—and excludes pending cases. Cross-art-unit records mask variation by art unit; individual art-unit profiles are available separately and may differ materially from this aggregate.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 25 decided applications with an interview and 71 without.
Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Stephen S Hong has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 108 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP