LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/STEPHEN S HONG
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Stephen S Hong

TECH CENTER 2100 · 2 ART UNITS · 101 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 2 ART UNITS

Examiner Stephen S Hong has allowed 50 of 101 decided applications (50%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

50% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2178 · 47%AU 2176 · 100%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Stephen S Hong maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning 2 art units. Across 101 disposed applications, his allowance rate is 50%. This rate reflects the proportion of decided cases (allowed and abandoned combined) in his pooled record. Of 108 total applications, 50 were allowed and 51 were abandoned. Seven applications remain pending and are excluded from the allowance-rate calculation. The record aggregates activity across multiple art units and represents historical outcomes only.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This examiner's pooled record combines data from 2 art units within TC 2100. Aggregate figures describe past decisions across a mixed portfolio and do not predict outcomes in any individual application. The allowance rate is calculated from decided applications only—allowed plus abandoned—and excludes pending cases. Cross-art-unit records mask variation by art unit; individual art-unit profiles are available separately and may differ materially from this aggregate.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2178
103 APPS · 47% ALLOWANCE
47% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 54%
DISPOSITION45 / 51 / 7allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION20.8 moart unit avg 25.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY37.7 moart unit avg 41.3 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility18% · art unit 36%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)74%
§103 — Obviousness90% · art unit 79%
§112 — Written description & definiteness57%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW60%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW42%+18 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 25 decided applications with an interview and 71 without.

ART UNIT 2176
5 APPS · 100% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.

100% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 59%
DISPOSITION5 / 0 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION11.1 moart unit avg 23.7 mo
TOTAL PENDENCYart unit avg 40.5 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Stephen S Hong

  • What is Stephen S Hong's overall allowance rate?
    50%, based on 101 disposed applications (50 allowed, 51 abandoned). This rate is historical and is not a prediction of any specific application.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    Two art units (2176 and 2178) within Technology Center 2100. The figures shown here are pooled across both units.
  • What does the allowance rate include and exclude?
    The 50% rate includes allowed and abandoned applications only. Seven pending applications are excluded. The rate does not include withdrawn or other non-decided dispositions.
  • Does this pooled record predict how my application will be handled?
    No. This record aggregates past decisions across multiple art units and is not a prediction of any specific application. Outcomes vary by art unit and case facts.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Stephen S Hong has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 108 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP